Skip to content

litCI: try switching A100 to L4 for oldest suites #21200

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Sep 15, 2025
Merged

litCI: try switching A100 to L4 for oldest suites #21200

merged 24 commits into from
Sep 15, 2025

Conversation

Borda
Copy link
Contributor

@Borda Borda commented Sep 11, 2025 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

What does this PR do?

shall save some money

Before submitting
  • Was this discussed/agreed via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or minor internal changes/refactors)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing, make sure you have read the review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

Reviewer checklist
  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pytorch-lightning--21200.org.readthedocs.build/en/21200/

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

⚡ Required checks status: All passing 🟢

Groups summary

🟢 pytorch_lightning: lit GPU
Check ID Status
pytorch.yml / Lit Job (nvidia/cuda:12.1.1-runtime-ubuntu22.04, pytorch, 3.10, L4_X_2) success ✅
pytorch.yml / Lit Job (nvidia/cuda:12.6.3-runtime-ubuntu22.04, lightning, 3.12, L4_X_2) success ✅
pytorch.yml / Lit Job (nvidia/cuda:12.6.3-runtime-ubuntu22.04, pytorch, 3.12, L4_X_2) success ✅

These checks are required after the changes to .lightning/workflows/pytorch.yml.

🟢 Benchmarks
Check ID Status
benchmark.yml / Lit Job (fabric) success ✅
benchmark.yml / Lit Job (pytorch) success ✅

These checks are required after the changes to .lightning/workflows/benchmark.yml.

🟢 lightning_fabric: lit GPU
Check ID Status
fabric.yml / Lit Job (nvidia/cuda:12.1.1-runtime-ubuntu22.04, fabric, 3.10, L4_X_2) success ✅
fabric.yml / Lit Job (nvidia/cuda:12.6.3-runtime-ubuntu22.04, fabric, 3.12, L4_X_2) success ✅
fabric.yml / Lit Job (nvidia/cuda:12.6.3-runtime-ubuntu22.04, lightning, 3.12, L4_X_2) success ✅

These checks are required after the changes to .lightning/workflows/fabric.yml.

Thank you for your contribution! 💜

Note
This comment is automatically generated and updates for 60 minutes every 180 seconds. If you have any other questions, contact carmocca for help.

@Borda

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci Continuous Integration label Sep 11, 2025
@Borda Borda merged commit 252bc21 into master Sep 15, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@Borda Borda deleted the ci/oldest-L4_X_2 branch September 15, 2025 12:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ethanwharris ethanwharris ethanwharris approved these changes

@tchaton tchaton tchaton approved these changes

@SkafteNicki SkafteNicki SkafteNicki approved these changes

@lantiga lantiga Awaiting requested review from lantiga lantiga is a code owner

@justusschock justusschock Awaiting requested review from justusschock justusschock is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ci Continuous Integration
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@Borda @ethanwharris @tchaton @SkafteNicki